The theoretical statistician uses x, the applied statistician uses y (because we reserve x for predictors).

Posted by Andrew on 1 November 2007, 10:21 am

The theoretical statistician uses x, the applied statistician uses y (because we reserve x for predictors).

## Recent Comments

- Shravan on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
*not*like a famous Borscht Belt comedy bit - Erikson on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
*not*like a famous Borscht Belt comedy bit - Shravan on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
*not*like a famous Borscht Belt comedy bit - Shravan on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
*not*like a famous Borscht Belt comedy bit - Shravan on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
*not*like a famous Borscht Belt comedy bit - Shravan on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
*not*like a famous Borscht Belt comedy bit - Adam on Looking at the polls: Time to get down and dirty with the data
- Adam on Looking at the polls: Time to get down and dirty with the data
- Daniel Lakeland on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
*not*like a famous Borscht Belt comedy bit - Rahul on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
*not*like a famous Borscht Belt comedy bit - Daniel Lakeland on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
*not*like a famous Borscht Belt comedy bit - Mayo on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
*not*like a famous Borscht Belt comedy bit - Mayo on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
*not*like a famous Borscht Belt comedy bit - Mayo on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
*not*like a famous Borscht Belt comedy bit - Mayo on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
*not*like a famous Borscht Belt comedy bit - Cliff AB on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
*not*like a famous Borscht Belt comedy bit - Laplace on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
*not*like a famous Borscht Belt comedy bit - Laplace on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
*not*like a famous Borscht Belt comedy bit - Andrew on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
*not*like a famous Borscht Belt comedy bit - mark on Cracks in the thin blue line

- Shravan on Why the garden-of-forking-paths criticism of p-values is
## Categories

The goal of the applied statistician is to answer "y?"

An applied statistician knows worth of "y".

A theoretical statistician knows all about measure theory but has never seen a measurement whereas the actual use of measure theory by the applied statistician is a set of measure zero.