John Johnson writes at the Statistics Forum.

Posted by Andrew on 10 May 2011, 12:16 pm

John Johnson writes at the Statistics Forum.

## Recent Comments

- Andrew on Abandon Statistical Significance
- Shlomo Engelson Argamon on Abandon Statistical Significance
- ojm on “Bayesian evidence synthesis”
- ojm on “Bayesian evidence synthesis”
- Andrew on Inference from an intervention with many outcomes, not using “statistical significance”
- Bob Carpenter on Baseball, apple pie, and Stan
- Phil on Baseball, apple pie, and Stan
- Brandon Vaughan on Inference from an intervention with many outcomes, not using “statistical significance”
- Tom Davies on Freelance orphans: “33 comparisons, 4 are statistically significant: much more than the 1.65 that would be expected by chance alone, so what’s the problem??”
- Andrew on Inference from an intervention with many outcomes, not using “statistical significance”
- Brandon Vaughan on Inference from an intervention with many outcomes, not using “statistical significance”
- Sameera Daniels on Beyond forking paths: using multilevel modeling to figure out what can be learned from this survey experiment
- Mark on Stan case studies
- Sameera Daniels on Beyond forking paths: using multilevel modeling to figure out what can be learned from this survey experiment
- Sam Warburton on Analyzing New Zealand fatal traffic crashes in Stan with added open-access science
- Peter Ellis on Analyzing New Zealand fatal traffic crashes in Stan with added open-access science
- Richard D. Morey on “Bayesian evidence synthesis”
- Andrew on Beyond forking paths: using multilevel modeling to figure out what can be learned from this survey experiment
- LemmusLemmus on Beyond forking paths: using multilevel modeling to figure out what can be learned from this survey experiment
- Stephen Martin on “Bayesian evidence synthesis”

## Categories