See more at the Statistics Forum (of course).

## Statistics plagiarism scandal

Posted by Andrew on 17 May 2011, 3:47 pm

See more at the Statistics Forum (of course).

## Recent Comments

- Nick Menzies on Some questions from our Ph.D. statistics qualifying exam
- Nick Menzies on Some questions from our Ph.D. statistics qualifying exam
- Keith O'Rourke on Some questions from our Ph.D. statistics qualifying exam
- QQ on Some questions from our Ph.D. statistics qualifying exam
- jimmy on Some questions from our Ph.D. statistics qualifying exam
- Zach on Some questions from our Ph.D. statistics qualifying exam
- Jonathan (another one) on Some questions from our Ph.D. statistics qualifying exam
- Zach on Some questions from our Ph.D. statistics qualifying exam
- Zach on Some questions from our Ph.D. statistics qualifying exam
- Gustaf on Stan 2.5, now with MATLAB, Julia, and ODEs
- Louis on Stan 2.5, now with MATLAB, Julia, and ODEs
- Anonymous on Sailing between the Scylla of hyping of sexy research and the Charybdis of reflexive skepticism
- Martha on Sailing between the Scylla of hyping of sexy research and the Charybdis of reflexive skepticism
- Rahul on Sailing between the Scylla of hyping of sexy research and the Charybdis of reflexive skepticism
- bxg on Sailing between the Scylla of hyping of sexy research and the Charybdis of reflexive skepticism
- bxg on Sailing between the Scylla of hyping of sexy research and the Charybdis of reflexive skepticism
- Steve Sailer on Sailing between the Scylla of hyping of sexy research and the Charybdis of reflexive skepticism
- bxg on Sailing between the Scylla of hyping of sexy research and the Charybdis of reflexive skepticism
- Corey on Sailing between the Scylla of hyping of sexy research and the Charybdis of reflexive skepticism

## Categories

If none of the co-authors was the plagiarist, then the authors still used someone else's writing in their paper. That's plagiarism, in many people's use of the term. At best they didn't know that the mystery person was in fact plagiarising, but by using the material they took on responsibility for it and so _they_ were plagiarising.

Of course, there's a spectrum of practices. I heard of a leading U.S. statistician who delegates some of his book reviews to smart graduate students. The (very grateful) ex-student who told me said, in effect, it's just his way of working. He makes the deal evident beforehand and makes it up to you in other ways by superb mentoring. Papers too, in other cases?