See more at the Statistics Forum (of course).

## Statistics plagiarism scandal

Posted by Andrew on 17 May 2011, 3:47 pm

See more at the Statistics Forum (of course).

## Recent Comments

- jonathan on How do data and experiments fit into a scientific research program?
- Shravan Vasishth on How do data and experiments fit into a scientific research program?
- Jonathan (another one) on How do data and experiments fit into a scientific research program?
- David Lentini on How do data and experiments fit into a scientific research program?
- David Lentini on How do data and experiments fit into a scientific research program?
- Daniel Gotthardt on Why do we communicate probability calculations so poorly, even when we know how to do it better?
- Rahul on Gigerenzer on logical rationality vs. ecological rationality
- Rahul on Why do we communicate probability calculations so poorly, even when we know how to do it better?
- Keith O'Rourke on Why do we communicate probability calculations so poorly, even when we know how to do it better?
- Keith O'Rourke on Why do we communicate probability calculations so poorly, even when we know how to do it better?
- Daniel Gotthardt on Why do we communicate probability calculations so poorly, even when we know how to do it better?
- Elrod on Gigerenzer on logical rationality vs. ecological rationality
- Andrew on Gigerenzer on logical rationality vs. ecological rationality
- Dale Lehman on Gigerenzer on logical rationality vs. ecological rationality
- jrkrideaku on Perhaps the most contextless email I’ve ever received
- Kyle C on Gigerenzer on logical rationality vs. ecological rationality
- Kyle C on Gigerenzer on logical rationality vs. ecological rationality
- Georgette Asherman on Perhaps the most contextless email I’ve ever received
- Fernando on Gigerenzer on logical rationality vs. ecological rationality
- Anonymous on Cognitive vs. behavioral in psychology, economics, and political science

## Categories

If none of the co-authors was the plagiarist, then the authors still used someone else's writing in their paper. That's plagiarism, in many people's use of the term. At best they didn't know that the mystery person was in fact plagiarising, but by using the material they took on responsibility for it and so _they_ were plagiarising.

Of course, there's a spectrum of practices. I heard of a leading U.S. statistician who delegates some of his book reviews to smart graduate students. The (very grateful) ex-student who told me said, in effect, it's just his way of working. He makes the deal evident beforehand and makes it up to you in other ways by superb mentoring. Papers too, in other cases?