See more at the Statistics Forum (of course).

Posted by Andrew on 17 May 2011, 3:47 pm

See more at the Statistics Forum (of course).

## Recent Comments

- ojm on Just google “Despite limited statistical power”
- ojm on Also holding back progress are those who make mistakes and then label correct arguments as “nonsensical.”
- ojm on Also holding back progress are those who make mistakes and then label correct arguments as “nonsensical.”
- Keith O'Rourke on Also holding back progress are those who make mistakes and then label correct arguments as “nonsensical.”
- Mayo on Also holding back progress are those who make mistakes and then label correct arguments as “nonsensical.”
- Carlos Ungil on Also holding back progress are those who make mistakes and then label correct arguments as “nonsensical.”
- Daniel Simpson on Also holding back progress are those who make mistakes and then label correct arguments as “nonsensical.”
- Mayo on Also holding back progress are those who make mistakes and then label correct arguments as “nonsensical.”
- Keith O'Rourke on Also holding back progress are those who make mistakes and then label correct arguments as “nonsensical.”
- Mayo on Also holding back progress are those who make mistakes and then label correct arguments as “nonsensical.”
- a reader on Just google “Despite limited statistical power”
- Corey on Just google “Despite limited statistical power”
- Keith O'Rourke on Also holding back progress are those who make mistakes and then label correct arguments as “nonsensical.”
- a reader on Also holding back progress are those who make mistakes and then label correct arguments as “nonsensical.”
- Clyde Schechter on Just google “Despite limited statistical power”
- a reader on Just google “Despite limited statistical power”
- Carlos Ungil on Just google “Despite limited statistical power”
- Daniel Lakeland on Just google “Despite limited statistical power”
- Daniel Lakeland on Just google “Despite limited statistical power”

## Categories

If none of the co-authors was the plagiarist, then the authors still used someone else's writing in their paper. That's plagiarism, in many people's use of the term. At best they didn't know that the mystery person was in fact plagiarising, but by using the material they took on responsibility for it and so _they_ were plagiarising.

Of course, there's a spectrum of practices. I heard of a leading U.S. statistician who delegates some of his book reviews to smart graduate students. The (very grateful) ex-student who told me said, in effect, it's just his way of working. He makes the deal evident beforehand and makes it up to you in other ways by superb mentoring. Papers too, in other cases?