Check out comment #9 here. All we need is for Steven Levitt, David Runciman, and some Reader in Management somewhere to weigh in and we’ll be all set.

Posted by Andrew on 5 January 2012, 10:13 pm

Check out comment #9 here. All we need is for Steven Levitt, David Runciman, and some Reader in Management somewhere to weigh in and we’ll be all set.

## Recent Comments

- Shravan on More evidence that even top researchers routinely misinterpret p-values
- Phil L on More evidence that even top researchers routinely misinterpret p-values
- Rahul on What makes a mathematical formula beautiful?
- Phil L on More evidence that even top researchers routinely misinterpret p-values
- Alex Gamma on What makes a mathematical formula beautiful?
- Rahul on More evidence that even top researchers routinely misinterpret p-values
- Rahul on What makes a mathematical formula beautiful?
- Michael Lew on More evidence that even top researchers routinely misinterpret p-values
- Andrew on Killer O
- Andrew on More evidence that even top researchers routinely misinterpret p-values
- Myles Gartland on More evidence that even top researchers routinely misinterpret p-values
- Llewelyn on What makes a mathematical formula beautiful?
- Llewelyn on Killer O
- Llewelyn on Killer O
- Anoneuoid on More evidence that even top researchers routinely misinterpret p-values
- Nichola Lawson on More evidence that even top researchers routinely misinterpret p-values
- Clark on More evidence that even top researchers routinely misinterpret p-values
- Toby on More evidence that even top researchers routinely misinterpret p-values
- matus on What makes a mathematical formula beautiful?
- Daniel Lakeland on More evidence that even top researchers routinely misinterpret p-values

## Categories