Skip to content
 

Fowlerpalooza!

Russ Lyons points us to a discussion in Statistics in Medicine of the famous claims by Christakis and Fowler on the contagion of obesity etc.

nicholaschristakis_interview

James O’Malley and Christakis and Fowler present the positive case.

Andrew Thomas and Tyler VanderWeele present constructive criticism.

Christakis and Fowler reply.

Coincidentally, a couple weeks ago an epidemiologist was explaining to me the differences between the Framingham Heart Study and the Nurses Health Study and why Framingham got the postmenopausal supplement risks right while Nurses got it wrong.

P.S. The journal issue also includes a comment on “A distribution-free test of constant mean in linear mixed effects models.” Wow! I had no idea people still did this sort of thing. How horrible. But I guess that’s what half-life is all about. These ideas last forever, they just become less and less relevant to people.

One Comment

  1. Nameless says:

    Non-paywalled links (one-sided selection, I don’t see open versions of the two critical papers)

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sim.5630/pdf
    jhfowler.ucsd.edu/social_contagion_theory.pdf
    http://jhfowler.ucsd.edu/social_contagion_theory_reply_to_commentaries.pdf