Gregg Easterbrook may not always be on the ball, but I 100% endorse the last section of his recent column (scroll down to “Absurd Specificity Watch”).

Earlier in the column, Easterbrook has a plug for Tim Tebow. I’d forgotten about Tim Tebow.

Posted by Andrew on 29 April 2013, 8:47 pm

Gregg Easterbrook may not always be on the ball, but I 100% endorse the last section of his recent column (scroll down to “Absurd Specificity Watch”).

Earlier in the column, Easterbrook has a plug for Tim Tebow. I’d forgotten about Tim Tebow.

## Recent Comments

- Friday links: zombie ideas in evolution and psychology, a world without statistics, and more | Dynamic Ecology on A world without statistics
- Andrew on A world without statistics
- Richard Gill on A world without statistics
- Andrew on Differences between econometrics and statistics: From varying treatment effects to utilities, economists seem to like models that are fixed in stone, while statisticians tend to be more comfortable with variation
- Steve Sailer on NFL players keep getting bigger and bigger
- Martha Smith on A world without statistics
- Martha Smith on Do differences between biology and statistics explain some of our diverging attitudes regarding criticism and replication of scientific claims?
- James G on NFL players keep getting bigger and bigger
- David Huelsbeck on A world without statistics
- Anonymous on A world without statistics
- Steve Sailer on A world without statistics
- Erika Salomon on If it was good enough for Martin Luther King and Laurence Tribe . . .
- Chris Auld on Differences between econometrics and statistics: From varying treatment effects to utilities, economists seem to like models that are fixed in stone, while statisticians tend to be more comfortable with variation
- Andrew on Differences between econometrics and statistics: From varying treatment effects to utilities, economists seem to like models that are fixed in stone, while statisticians tend to be more comfortable with variation
- Chris Auld on Differences between econometrics and statistics: From varying treatment effects to utilities, economists seem to like models that are fixed in stone, while statisticians tend to be more comfortable with variation
- Andrew on Differences between econometrics and statistics: From varying treatment effects to utilities, economists seem to like models that are fixed in stone, while statisticians tend to be more comfortable with variation
- Chris Auld on Differences between econometrics and statistics: From varying treatment effects to utilities, economists seem to like models that are fixed in stone, while statisticians tend to be more comfortable with variation
- KV on A world without statistics

## Categories

I often wondered why our snow parking ticket was $37? How did the city come up with that number!

I don’t know about that. The number of digits in some of these examples are clearly pointless if not misleading, trying to convey an unwarranted confidence in an estimate, but some other examples have a sense.

In the case of the SUV, the quoted 35.4 inches correspond to 90cm. The 7.9-inch display of an iPad mini has a 20cm diagonal. Conversely, 8.9cm should likely be understood as 3½ inches. The extra digits are simply an artifact due to how the the available information is presented. On the same line, an 8-bit converter reporting a measurements of .19140625 does not claim to have 7 significant digits, the number of significant digits is still 2.4 (i.e. 8 bits, or two hexadecimal digits), but in order to convey those 2.4 digits you might need 7 digits.

A difference between 8.95% and 9.00% in tax rates, correspond to a difference of 500$ on a yearly income of 100k: small compared to the yearly income, but not a negligible amount for some instant gratification, be it luxury shoes or a top-of-the-rank iPad.

I always liked the news report that said that the temperature of a particular star was 10,000,000,273.16 C