People keep pointing me to this.

P.S. I miss the old days when people would point me to bad graphs.

## Recent Comments

- Andrew on The statistical significance filter leads to overoptimistic expectations of replicability
- Anoneuoid on Garden of forking paths – poker analogy
- Sander Greenland on The statistical significance filter leads to overoptimistic expectations of replicability
- Sander Greenland on The statistical significance filter leads to overoptimistic expectations of replicability
- Kyle C on The statistical significance filter leads to overoptimistic expectations of replicability
- a reader on The statistical significance filter leads to overoptimistic expectations of replicability
- Sander Greenland on The statistical significance filter leads to overoptimistic expectations of replicability
- Paul Alper on The anthropic principle in statistics
- John Hall on Stan on TV
- Keith O'Rourke on The statistical significance filter leads to overoptimistic expectations of replicability
- Keith O'Rourke on The anthropic principle in statistics
- Andrew on “I admire the authors for simply admitting they made an error and stating clearly and without equivocation that their original conclusions were not substantiated.”
- Erin Jonaitis on The statistical significance filter leads to overoptimistic expectations of replicability
- Juan Pablo on “I admire the authors for simply admitting they made an error and stating clearly and without equivocation that their original conclusions were not substantiated.”
- gwern on The anthropic principle in statistics
- Andrew on How to think about research, and research criticism, and research criticism criticism, and research criticism criticism criticism?
- Keith O'Rourke on The anthropic principle in statistics
- Keith O'Rourke on How to think about research, and research criticism, and research criticism criticism, and research criticism criticism criticism?
- Anonymous on How to think about research, and research criticism, and research criticism criticism, and research criticism criticism criticism?

## Categories

You want graphs? Look down at Figure 4.4 here (about half way down):

http://c23catfish.wikispaces.com/Assessment+4

Oof! OK, you win.

Wow!

Matthew Yglesias is all over the bad-graph beat.

http://www.vox.com/2014/7/23/5930695/ted-cruz-makes-the-worlds-worst-chart

I don’t understand how people create plots like this when the numbers don’t seem to match up with the bars at all. When people give numbers to their publication departments to plot, do they just draw the plots without plugging in the numbers? That just seems more work. Check out the figures on page 2 of http://www.ibm.com/smarterplanet/global/files/se__sv_se__intelligence__Analytics_-_The_real-world_use_of_big_data.pdf. It is kind of funny (but worrying) that a report about accurately using data losing much of its credibility by its poor presentation.

Oh come now ! that’s just a ‘creative/alternate representation’ of a pi-chart ! Squares are the new circles. The more worrying bit is that the first square-plot does not even add to a 100% !

For a daily dose of bad graphs: http://www.reddit.com/r/dataisugly/