We get a lot of good comments on this blog but this one’s especially memorable. From Erin Jonaitis:

Your closest collaborator is you six months ago but you don’t reply to email.

## Recent Comments

- Sameera Daniels on Where that title came from
- Sameera Daniels on Where that title came from
- Keith O'Rourke on Where that title came from
- Keith O'Rourke on “The idea of replication is central not just to scientific practice but also to formal statistics . . . Frequentist statistics relies on the reference set of repeated experiments, and Bayesian statistics relies on the prior distribution which represents the population of effects.”
- Sameera Daniels on Where that title came from
- Mark Palko on If you have a measure, it will be gamed (politics edition).
- Phil on Where that title came from
- J. D. Daniels on This sentence by Thomas Mallon would make Barry N. Malzberg spin in his grave, except that he’s still alive so it would just make him spin in his retirement
- Martha (Smith) on “The idea of replication is central not just to scientific practice but also to formal statistics . . . Frequentist statistics relies on the reference set of repeated experiments, and Bayesian statistics relies on the prior distribution which represents the population of effects.”
- Martha (Smith) on “The idea of replication is central not just to scientific practice but also to formal statistics . . . Frequentist statistics relies on the reference set of repeated experiments, and Bayesian statistics relies on the prior distribution which represents the population of effects.”
- someone on The “Carl Sagan effect”
- Sameera Daniels on “The idea of replication is central not just to scientific practice but also to formal statistics . . . Frequentist statistics relies on the reference set of repeated experiments, and Bayesian statistics relies on the prior distribution which represents the population of effects.”
- Keith O'Rourke on “The idea of replication is central not just to scientific practice but also to formal statistics . . . Frequentist statistics relies on the reference set of repeated experiments, and Bayesian statistics relies on the prior distribution which represents the population of effects.”
- Keith O'Rourke on “The idea of replication is central not just to scientific practice but also to formal statistics . . . Frequentist statistics relies on the reference set of repeated experiments, and Bayesian statistics relies on the prior distribution which represents the population of effects.”
- steven t johnson on “The idea of replication is central not just to scientific practice but also to formal statistics . . . Frequentist statistics relies on the reference set of repeated experiments, and Bayesian statistics relies on the prior distribution which represents the population of effects.”
- Nat on “The idea of replication is central not just to scientific practice but also to formal statistics . . . Frequentist statistics relies on the reference set of repeated experiments, and Bayesian statistics relies on the prior distribution which represents the population of effects.”
- Jonathan Grooms on That claim that Harvard admissions discriminate in favor of Jews? After seeing the statistics, I don’t see it.
- Sameera Daniels on “The idea of replication is central not just to scientific practice but also to formal statistics . . . Frequentist statistics relies on the reference set of repeated experiments, and Bayesian statistics relies on the prior distribution which represents the population of effects.”
- Justin Smith on The course of science
- Anoneuoid on “The idea of replication is central not just to scientific practice but also to formal statistics . . . Frequentist statistics relies on the reference set of repeated experiments, and Bayesian statistics relies on the prior distribution which represents the population of effects.”

## Categories

Yes, this is a great comment.

It’s a bit less true than it used to be. Comprehensive search software on PCs can find things in a way that that file drawers full of manila folders were useless for. (not to mention the era of ambiguously labeled floppy disks).

Due to a hand tremor, I find it difficult to read my handwritten notes after a few weeks have passed, so I’ve gotten in the habit of typing up the notes. This turns out to be a great boon to finding your thoughts later — along with the fact that in the process of lazy typing I do some editing.

Still, I’d love to collaborate with the person I was at 25. I’d also like to yell at him to hurry up and just finish the darned dissertation already.

> hurry up and just finish the darned dissertation already.

Almost all of us should have heeded that!

Given the blog delay, I end up spend lots of time arguing with myself from 2 months ago!

I can’t take the credit for this hilarious observation, which belongs to Karl Broman, a former professor of mine who teaches a great course on Tools for Reproducible Research. Shame on me if I didn’t credit him before!

[…] few months ago, I mentioned efforts to teach for reproducibility in intro stats courses. Today, the comments in Andrew Gelman’s blog post had a link to a course (taught by University of Wisconsin Biostatistican Karl Broman) that is […]

[…] Your closest collaborator . . . and why you can’t talk with her […]