Skip to content
 

Stan wins again!

See here.

2 Comments

  1. Corey says:

    Did anyone else pop this open in a new tab for future reading and then when coming back to it later wonder why the hell they were reading about tennis?

  2. Wayne Folta says:

    The linked article is a great illustration of the thought that should go into priors:

    “Coming into this match, Wawrinka was 4-19 against Djokovic (and 2-19 when facing the top-ranked player.) But that was a misleading stat.”

    So `Beta(4, 19)` would be the obvious but wrong choice, eh?

Leave a Reply