The Case for More False Positives in Anti-doping Testing Posted on April 4, 2011 9:08 AM by Andrew No joke. See here (from Kaiser Fung). At the Statistics Forum.
I cant understand his arguments. Given an option, an athlete would rather come second and lose to a false negative, than risk a 1% probability of getting banned for life!
I cant understand his arguments.
Given an option, an athlete would rather come second and lose to a false negative, than risk a 1% probability of getting banned for life!